The good leader of Hindustan?
This rant began taking shape in my head in early December when there was a People’s United Front, a group of Mumbaikars fed up with the current state of affairs after the 26/11 (Funny how it has the same sing-along tone of 9/11 and equally horrifying memories.) attacks.
All those who cared — I can only recall young faces here — gathered together at the Gateway of India and asked for a better administration with placards and slogans. There are only two placards that remained with me: “Will I be alive till the next election” and “US politicians go to Yale, ours go to jail
Of course, now that we have to elect the 15th Lok Sabha by June 2, the two slogans have begun to take root and prompted me to write this.
I read this Washington Post article about Norm Eisen who is the White House ethics adviser. And it has prompted me to remember the placards. Why don’t we have a government that has ethics committee or even a proper ethics manifest, let alone leaders and staff that follows them ethically? And the land of great dreams has a person who tells even the President what is ethically right while he holds the high office.
I talked with a lawyer friend a few months ago, right after the attacks, when I was as affected by the fear that ruled us all — what can be done to change the Constitution.
Sadly, his answer made me angrier. The Constitution cannot be changed by just about anyone. I wanted to change the Constitution so that we could get ‘proper leaders’, the ones who rise above caste politics and hemming their own pockets to help improve the country; who had, at least, the minimum qualification to rule a population, a nation. However, my dreams of that change came crashing down when I realised the ones who will make the change into a legal amendment will be those who will be most affected by that change —the politicians. So, I had to kiss that particular change goodbye forever.
However, there is this new party, called the Professional’s Party of India, which launched its Mumbai office a couple of weeks ago. This, if it stays true to its party objective, could be the collective Obama for India — Change, We Can. It is a party that has professional taking up the political mantle and trying to do something better than the way-beyond-expiry date politicians of our country.
Anyone who has been convicted or incarcerated can contest to be the Member of Parliament, if only a higher court suspends their sentence or punishment — what kind of logic is that? It means any serial killer, a psychopath, any sociopath can contest election. Just get any higher court to approve of their petition and voila, we have a contestant. The latest news of party infighting and allies turning foes have only left me more disillusioned. At times, I try to understand, where did we go wrong!
On a funnier note though, there is Bleed India — of course, those who have tired of reading about TOI's Lead India project — so that we the citizens can see for themselves what exactly have we got despite exercising our franchise.
1 Comments:
I appreciate your wrath dear Agnostia. Keep it brewing, one day we will sip a revolution out of that cup. There are few things on which I would like to comment.
Ethics committee in India is a far dream. And am not sure if I really want one here. As far as our country is concern, ethics or moral principles change after every few 100 kilometres (sometimes earlier). How can we have a committee on something which we have not been able to decide for last 2000 years! Indians have always believed in personal ethics. Though they never shy away from acting as a police for ethics for others yet for themselves they follow their heart. So if you tell an Indian not to give alms to beggars, you are deprived of a sense of altruism and if you tell the same Indian to file income tax regularly (and pay his tax) you are a leech feeding on a common man’s blood!
The problem with morality is it is supposed to be in everybody but monitored only by individuals. When ethics are monitored by others they start to get reprehensive. Moreover, who shall draw the line between ethics and immorality? Broadly being honest and philanthropic can be ethical but then these qualities, too, tend to get subjective. I can give you numerous examples when we meet.
I remember when I started taking keen interest in politics and general affairs of the country, the first thing that came to my mind was ‘Lets change the constitution’. But over the years, I have realised the fallacy of the very concept of democracy (actually I have realised the fallacy of ‘concept’ itself!) and constitution. I am not being cynical, just talking what I realised. It was a pain to read Constitution by DD Basu…but boss what a book!
Basu made me value (and cherish) the constitution of India. We are among the very few nations in the world who have a drafted constitution. Not to mention the fact that those who claim to have one hardly follow it. Constitution always reminds me of Hinduism (I am not being fundamentalist). In Hinduism we always have a tod or substitute of something which you cannot do. For example, while fasting you are supposed not to eat or drink but in case you cant survive without food, you can have falahaar! Gods anyways will be happy with your fast. Similarly in Indian constitution every act has a counter act or for every action there is a check. You can survive no matter what you do. So if you want to change the constitution you need al least 302 people like you to do it!
Here I would like to bring my third point which is the Professional Party of India. These professional politicians will not win this election, for sure, but they will create an environment. They will create a generation from which you will have your 301 colleagues who will venture to change the constitution (I am sure during that government you will stick to your manifesto). Right now is the time to work on the manifesto and of course, do not underestimate the power of human.
Mat sehel haemin jano firta hai falak barson
Tab khaaq ke parde se insaan nikalte hain
Post a Comment
<< Home